You cannot judge Tyler Robinson's ideology without considering his actions in killing Charlie Kirk

The idea that his ideology is unknown flies in the face of who he was, what he did, and why he said he did it.

There has been a ridiculous argument waging over what side of the aisle Tyler Robinson's political affiliation most closely identifies with. From word one, conservatives assumed that someone who killed Charlie Kirk was likely a leftist. Much of this has been confirmed by his parents and other close friends who have suggested he has gone down a leftist path and has started to identify more and more with LGBTQ and specifically trans-rights. On the left, all it took was some rumors that he was tied to Nick Fuentes and the groyper movement, and a couple of photoshopped pictures showing him wearing Trump garb and they were immediately arguing that he was confirmed MAGA. They argued that anything is parents or friends stated in defiance of this belief was being taken out of context, and even denied for some time that Robinson was in a relationship with a transgender. Instead they demanded it was an ultra-conservative on conservative murder and no amount of common sense would move them. Unfortunately, this thinking was also prevalent in the MSM, who pushed the backstory of him being raised conservatives, as well as reporting on the conspiracy that he was part of the groyper movement, while sometimes even admitting there was no actual evidence that he was.

However, as the Groyper suggestions have fizzled due to facts, the blatant photoshops have been exposed, and the more we have learned more about his actions, his words, his story, and the notes he left for his partner, it has become crystal clear that he was neither a grouper or a conservative. Now the left and the media has shifted gears and suggested that we do not know enough about his ideology to even make a guess at what he stood for and the motivations for his attack on Kirk are just as unclear and anyone suggesting they know is actually just spinning. The argument, it would seem, is because there was no manifesto, he did not have some politicized web presence, and he was not actually a declared Republican or Democrat, that it is now entirely impossible to even guess at his political ideals or ideology.

But sometimes, someone's actions speak for themselves. 99.9% of the people in the world do not have manifestos and a majority of people are not politically active enough to start a website or join a political group. But if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, well then it is likely a duck. In this case, we have a bi-sexual in a relationship with a transgender who had numerous conversations about how he thought Charlie Kirk spread hate towards gays and trans. He then openly decided to kill him.

Let's be clear. Tyler Robinson did not get the idea that Charlie Kirk was hateful towards the alphabet community from reading Red State or Hot Air. He didn't get it from watching FOX News or Newsmax. No conservative who followed other conservatives would have had this opinion about Charlie Kirk. Nope. He got this from liberals who were willing to smear Charlie Kirk, because they couldn't stand the fact that he stood up, had open debates, and was actually making a difference and changing people's minds. He got this 100% from liberal ideology, plain and simple. There is no other place he could have gotten in.

But for now, liberals have gone from losing the argument that he was MAGA to simply acting dumb. Whether they believe it or not, this is making them look as dumb as they are acting.