top of page
Search

USSC rules that District Court National injunctions are unconstitutional.

  • 3 days ago
  • 1 min read
Amy Coney Barret spanks Ketanji Brown Jackson in her opinion, specifically criticizing the dissent.

This was the big one! At this point, 90% of the District Court decisions against Trump will need to be narrowed down to only those who are before the court. Moreover, this could prevent many of these lawsuits from taking place from an issue of standing. Considering most of these lawsuits are being brought by States and other liberal interest groups, rather than the people affected.


Considered all of the case regarding federal employees being fired. How can a district court judge determine how these people are injured, when they are not even hearing from the people being fired? This should also stop the concept of judge shopping as well, as they will need to file in the district of people specifically supposedly injured.


Will this put an immediate end to this problem? Of course not. There will be district court judges who will just blatantly thumb their nose at it and those that will try to be more clever how they make these rulings. Look for many emergency petitions straight to the high court from the Administration asking for the high court to "clarify" these various situations. Make no mistake, the left did not spend all this time finding these partisan district judges to do their political bidding, only to give up easily.

 
 
 

11 Comments


Unknown member
2 days ago

Like

Unknown member
2 days ago

Like

Unknown member
2 days ago

Like

Unknown member
2 days ago

Oh, lookie here -



Like

Unknown member
3 days ago

Perhaps the death of Barret's conservatism was overstated?

Like
Unknown member
2 days ago
Replying to

she was in that 6-3 majority in several cases though....

Like

Drop Me a Line, Let Me Know What You Think

Thanks for submitting!

© 2022 by Coldheartedtruth. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page