Tucker Carlson makes perfect sense

Which is likely why no actual network wants him to be part of their programming

Tucker states the obvious. That the important subjects of the day are being basically ignored, while the discussions we do have are largely irrelevant.

A slightly deeper dive into this concept might be to suggest that the differences between the two parties are little more than distractions to keep our focus away from the areas where they do agree. That effectively we have a one Party state that works along side (not necessarily controlled by) the large corporate interests. That everyone involved in this has the same large long range goals in mind. To control the resources of the country (and the people) for their own benefit.

Now that is not to say that the two Parties do not have some fundamental differences. I would bet the farm that not every one of the 525 members of Congress are part of a larger conspiracy to control the country through one party rule. Many probably truly see themselves as Party first faithful to their cause politicians.

But I have no doubt that the power players on both sides have a lot more conjoining interests than they do competing interests. Perhaps to some degree, the power players are even manipulating their own membership to the same degree that they manipulate the media into determining what we do discuss... and more importantly what we do not discuss.

Now this would largely undermine the idea that the media and Democrats are the true conspirators, which has always been a popular theory. Perhaps that is still true between those who are being manipulated (as in the die hard liberal politicians who truly believe the Right is their enemy and the legacy media who follows along). That suggests that it also might be just another distraction. That they are not really as important as they might think, other than to serve the greater needs of the people behind the curtain.

Is it any wonder that people like Mitch McConnell seemed to had have little interest in winning back the Senate? Or that former politicians in key roles like Paul Ryan seem to fall more in line with those who want to see people like Tucker Carlson silenced? They certainly seem quick to undermine their own Party for their own personal power? Is it truly just selfishness, or does that serve a larger purpose of the "one party state".

Lastly... is this why there is a "never-Trump" coalition from the right that seems unwilling to defend him, even against the most egregious assaults against American principals. That their issue with Trump is "not" really about his peculiar behavior or his penchant for stepping into trouble, but because he literally refuses to play along and has the courage to stand up to it all and attempt to expose it? Perhaps Donald Trump is a danger to the America that the corporate and political elite have built, even if he is no real danger to the America that most people actually want. That certainly makes as much sense as anything else.