So check this out

Number of injunctions per President.

So our judiciary was able to function for approximately 200 years without ever having to issue a national injunction. 0ur district court judges stuck to their lanes and their district authority.

Now to the best of my abilities, I have not found that any of the injunctions handed down to Bush and Obama were overturned on appeal. This would suggest that there may have been some legitimate reason to have issued these. But there were only about 1.125 of these a year, so they were not very common. I did not try to go through the Trump or Biden years. Maybe when I have a spare week to waste.

So far several of the national injunctions put in place in this term have been lifted by either the appellate or Supreme court (I believe we are up to five so far or 33% of them). Even many people on the left acknowledge that some of these injunctions will likely be overturned, but argue that they are necessary for whatever reasons... when in fact everyone understands that they are political in nature and flat out designed to undermine the Trump Presidency. Most of the right suggest that many of these will be overturned, that the Administration will likely just need to tweak others to move past the rulings, and that a few will likely be upheld. Some (like the most recent deportations of the Venezuelan street gang members) seem to have garnered arguments on both sides and neither is backing down on that one.

At the end of the day, our district courts are no longer just district courts. They are political pawns being used to further a political cause. This was never their design and may actually turn out to work to their disadvantage long term. Not that most of these judges care either about their own design or the long term repercussions.