More hypocritical nonsense... Judge awards $1 million over BLM sign...

While BLM was teaming up with Antifa to destroy hundreds of businesses and cost Americans over 2 billion dollars, a churched sued the "Proud Boys" for wrecking a cardboard BLM sign.

Back during the 2020 election and the “Summer of Love” BLM riots, a group of Proud Boys was seen tearing down a Black Lives Matter sign outside of a predominantly Black church in Washington. Arrests were made, though not of the rioters, of course. And a lawsuit was brought against the group. Now a Superior Court judge in Washington has ordered the group to pay more than a million dollars in reparations. Since the entire thing was caught on video, there is little doubt as to who was responsible, but this case raises a couple of immediate and obvious questions. First, how much actual damage was incurred? And perhaps even more to the point, who gets stuck with the bill?

The term "sign" is misleading in that it was not like a street sign or a billboard sign, but rather it was cardboard reinforced poster. How this poster is supposedly worth a million dollars is anyone's guess, but the judge in this case obviously had an agenda that went beyond the actions of the parties involved.

Now interestingly, the handful of individuals involved were identified personally but were not named in the lawsuit. I suspect that anyone associated with a groups that was burning down businesses, blowing up cars, looting retail establishments, and attacking law enforcement would look pretty stupid if they sued Frank Burns, Todd Smith, Fred Jones, John Doe, etc... for tearing down a poster. The politics of the situation demanded that they sue an abstract idea of a group rather than the individuals responsible.

Obviously this was not about getting any specific justice for the people who tore down a sign. This was more about the politicized DC and Democratic attempt to demonize groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers as "dangerous white supremacist groups" when in reality they are far less "dangerous" than Antifa or other groups who run interference for BLM. The actual original ideals of these groups have been cast aside and replaced with media portrayals of the groups as of they are the KKK on steroids.

If you now look under Wikipedia or any other media description of the Proud Boys, they are quick to point out all of the "charges" that have been brought against them. This was the idea all along. If they just point out what they "do" - it would look like a bridge club in comparison to what a group like Antifa does. But when they can simply cite the inherently discriminating selective charges for their activity, it helps deliver this message. Clever, but still obvious to anyone who is honest.

While I am no fan and abhor any group that calls for violence, the Proud Boys are a reactionary group that came about specifically because society has been attacking the entire concept of traditional male concepts. The idea of toxic masculinity becoming all the rage along with the constant social attacks on any form or traditional male female stereotypes have led many men to go hard in two opposing directions.

The first, is the wimpy male liberal who falls to his knees and apologizes for being born a male and grovels even harder if they were born white and male. I mean, can they even ever apologize enough? The second are the ones to scoff at this and suggest that they are proud to be a white male, see no need to apologize and are willing to fight back against a society that have deemed all traditional male attributes as things to abolish.

We can watch college professors tearing down posters, tipping over tables, destroying displays, all because they disagree with the message. Most will get away without consequences as professors at their place of work, and pretty much all of them will avoid criminal or civil liability. What is the difference between destroying a pro-life display and destroying a BLM poster? Why (if not blatant hypocrisy) is one worth nothing and the other worth a million dollars.

Another great example where the DC powers to be, the Democrats in office, and the deep state within our Federal government have created two tiers of justice. These people no longer judge people on what they do, but almost exclusively judge them on who they are.