top of page

McCarthy predicted and destroyed Smith's latest faux indictment of Trump


McCarthy goes through these one by one and I believe he guessed them all. But the bottom line is that in each and everyone of these indictments, Smith is looking to rehash an old court case that tossed the same sorts of cases out.

That being said, nobody actually believes that Smith is actually a serious prosecutor at this point. His job is not to seek to justice, but to make sure he can stop Trump from running for President because of the strong fear from Democrats that he would likely win. There is no excuse to bring unprecedented charges against a former President and Presidential candidate unless it is completely beyond reproach. You should allow no opportunity for any legal experts to question your legal logic or ethical decision making.


All that being said, this is exactly why Biden had Garland bring in Smith from Australia (couldn't find anyone here, huh). Because they knew Smith would show no real regard for anything other than the Democratic cause to bring down a political opponent by any means necessary.

34 views

14 Kommentare


Unknown member
02. Aug. 2023


Gefällt mir

Unknown member
02. Aug. 2023

Ask the alky if he's started to transition his brand new grandson yet.


Gefällt mir

Unknown member
02. Aug. 2023

Roger send me messages explaining that Trump got indicted.


If that's the "genius" he's probably talking about the first indictment since he's so far behind, and he probably learned about it from listening to the neighbor's dog.


and he gets to vote


Gefällt mir

Unknown member
02. Aug. 2023

SPOT ON:


This is not an indictment, this is a Jake Tapper "news" script.
He is claiming that Trump's "lies" about the election "fueled" the January 6th riots, and therefore.... Trump is criminally culpable?
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. It has been established and reaffirmed over a century that the only speech that can be criminalized is direct, unambiguous incitement telling people to commit a crime. And further, even if you do tell people to commit a crime (as communist and anarchist revolutionaries often do), the speech can only be criminal if there is a clear and present danger of the crimes being committed.
You cannot be charged for "incitement" for expressing your…

Gefällt mir

Unknown member
02. Aug. 2023
This is literally tearing the country in two and it's all about protecting Joe Biden? Why the fuck would Democrats not be willing to throw this corrupt spiteful little man under the bus here? They say that almost nobody likes him and most believe he is as dumb as his son.

But this is all about trying to get this man reelected President??

Because it's so much bigger than Biden. This is only about keeping the White House on its face.


The Deep State and all that goes with it - the institutions, the networks, the spy agencies, The DOJ/FBI...


...THE POWER - is what's at stake here. Trump poses a threat, a clear and present danger to al…


Gefällt mir
bottom of page