top of page

Here is a question of ethics...

Both the prosecution and the judge know that NDAs are not considered campaign expenses by the overseeing agency (Federal Elections Committee).

In fact, Alvin Bragg worked for the Southern District of New York when they were considering charges against Trump for violation of campaign laws. They were basically told by the FEC that Donald Trump did not commit any sort of reporting violations in regards to the NDAs and obviously then refused to bring any charges.


So after being told as an assistant US Attorney that Trump was not guilty of any sort of campaign violations, he is now telling a jury that in fact, Donald Trump was guilty of said violations. Bragg actually knows he is not telling the truth and so does the Judge. So not only is Bragg lying to the jury, the judge is allowing it, but the judge is gong to limit the FEC witness on Trump's witness list to questions that are not related specifically to the charges of the case. In other words, the judge knows that the FEC witness will make the statement (as the ultimate authority of the law) that there were no violations, so he will not allow that witness to testify to those questions?

How is this possible?



33 views

6 Comments



Unknown member
May 15

Prediction -


This all leads to a conviction, giving Dementia Joe the excuse to not debate when he declares that he won't debate a convicted felon, then it all get's overturned on appeal.


Like


Unknown member
May 15

Hey I heard Obama is looking for a chef with swimming skills too.


And the ability to keep his mouth shut, eyes closed, and ears covered.

Edited
Like

Unknown member
May 15

Beaners are good swimmers, NYC Mayor Adams


"How do we have a large body of people that are in our city, our country, that are excellent swimmers and at the same time we need lifeguards — and the only obstacle is that we won’t give them the right to work to become a lifeguard," the mayor said.


"That just doesn’t make sense."


Like
bottom of page