All of that "leaked" nonsense about them being ahead in every battleground state was a lie
Not sure if this lie came from the Harris campaign or if it was just some silly people demanding that they had inside information that they never really had. But it certainly looks like the only side who was being honest in leaking numbers, was the Trump side.
All that being said, we should always take leaked information with a grain of salt and according to Plouffe, we should have taken those media polls showing Harris ahead with a grain of salt. He suggests that those polls were sort of what the campaign was clinging to, hoping they were the ones who were wrong. But boy, does this paint a different picture of the election and how it was ultimately covered. Did the media pollsters also figure she was behind, but fudged things just enough? All I can say is the post-election honesty is a good thing here!
Trump now has a favorability rating of 51% - more than half of Americans now view him favorably. In 2017 it was around 40%.
Guess it was just Tik Tok but here is the short video (btw Trump killed Harris on Tik Tok)
Ruben R. on X: "@amyforsandiego Oh wow, apparently the oldest person of Kamala HQ TikTok team was 25 years old. https://t.co/coa9VsfInJ" / X
EXCLUSIVE: Top Harris Campaign Staff Tell Us What Went Wrong In 2024 Election
This is the entire conversation, CHT may find it interesting, I am listening at 1.5x but keeping going to other things. What is amazing is how self-unaware they are. Saw a posting a few days ago from Harris' social media team. Oldest was 25 and remember one was 19. All were really clueless other than knowing how many follows they were getting (which was really just by virtue of their role). But they were DEI. That part actually worked as you would expect.
and that they were unsure where the media polls were getting their numbers.
And there's the lie.
Ploof, and every other leftist scumbag "consultant" knows full well that the majority of the pollsters are reliably left-wing, and that their numbers were nothing more than wish-casting, hoping to drive the result rather than reflect voter sentiment; the source of those numbers being deep within the pollsters own colons.