Involving a male claiming to be a women, who rapes three women inmates in women's prison, impregnating one.
So let's start with the idea that an actual transgender women would at least in theory not want to rape cis-women. Sort of part of the idea of being trapped in the wrong body is that you don't have male feelings, which one would assume is sexual feelings. So it becomes clear that we have someone who is rigging the system. I mean there are probably some men who wouldn't mind being locked up with hundreds of women even if they did nothing wrong.
But that is not even the dumb part. The dumb part is what the judge is demanding here:
Yep, you are reading that correctly. The rapist is entitled to gender dignity while facing charges of raping three women. Now this is problematic for quite a few reasons. One can almost see how a Judge would demand that court papers and such refer to the person with the preferred pronouns. But how does a trial lawyer address a jury when he cannot refer to the person with a penis who raped and impregnated women as a man?
Worse yet, the Judge is also demanding that the victims refer to the rapist by preferred pronouns as well. Because that is all a person needs while referring back to a traumatic experience is a judge demanding that you treat your attacker with respect and dignity in terms of their gender preference. Not withstanding that the person claiming to be a women, raped other women... with male genitalia.
So yeah, "she" pulled out "her" dong and fucked me up my ass. Then "she" proceeded to stick it up my pussy and blow "her" load, knocking me up. That sounds like a great court to be a part of.
Comments